The awkward questions, answered
Seven objections, five commitments with a remedy attached to each, and a list of the operators this practice is wrong for.
Fixed fees · One business day to reply · You keep everything
Eight practical differences
Not values, and not adjectives. Eight things that happen differently on a Monday morning.
- Reports installs and signupsReports first transfers and repeat sends
- Bills a percentage of your media spendBills a fixed fee, agreed before the work
- Learns your corridor on your budgetArrives knowing the corridor economics
- Submits the ad account and hopesPrepares the verification pack first
- Treats KYC as somebody else's screenTreats KYC as the funnel it actually is
- Answers a compliance question to keep movingSends that question to a qualified specialist
- Adds a channel when growth stallsChecks the tracking before adding anything
- Keeps the account team across four industriesWorks on money transfer accounts only
What can be checked
No client figure appears anywhere on this site without written permission from the operator.
Every commitment above carries a remedy that has been agreed internally before publication.
Licensing, AML and regulatory questions are referred out in writing, on every engagement.
These are facts about how the practice is run, not client results.
Anything else
Yes, and they are written into the engagement letter. A remedy that only lives on a website is marketing rather than a commitment.
Where the operator wants that, yes. The audit findings go to both sides, and the incumbent gets the same document you do.
A recommendation, priced. Sometimes it says do nothing for a quarter, and that answer costs the same as any other.
Yes, before any account access or corridor data is shared. That is normal here, not a favour.
Where an operator has agreed to that, yes. Nobody gets volunteered as a reference without asking them first.